Inputs
QuickBooks Online sandbox, Gmail, Google Drive contracts and documents, and Microsoft Teams. The company is fictional; connected source reads are live in the controlled sandbox.
Harborview is a fictional consulting company. We planted 12 known finance issues across its connected sandbox sources, ran the office once, and scored whether it found the issue, matched the relevant amount and showed evidence.
Inspect the live officeQuickBooks Online sandbox, Gmail, Google Drive contracts and documents, and Microsoft Teams. The company is fictional; connected source reads are live in the controlled sandbox.
For each planted issue: found, amount matches where applicable, and source evidence shown. This is not a claim of universal production accuracy.
12 of 12 planted issues found in one seven-minute pass. Eight were proven from available evidence; four were likely and explicitly required confirmation.
Links open the relevant office area. The bank-change record is available as a visitor deep link; the other test issues are summarized in the close and numbers panels.
Two payments for the same May invoice. See in the office →
Six months of unordered support charges. See in the office →
Meridian milestone recorded before documented acceptance. See in the office →
Sunrise renewal pricing not reflected in invoices. See in the office →
Approved hours not accrued at month-end. See in the office →
Laptop refresh requires capitalization-policy confirmation. See in the office →
Annual premium was recorded entirely in January. See in the office →
Keystone receipt and bank fee missing from the books. See in the office →
Loan balance and interest expense were misstated. See in the office →
Owner expense recorded as business travel. See in the office →
Atlas credit memo was never issued. See in the office →
Look-alike email with hidden instructions. Open the evidence →
| Evidence state | Count in the 12-item test | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Proven | 8 | Ledger, bank, email or other available source directly supported the finding. |
| Likely | 4 | The pattern was material, but a contract or policy detail needed named-person confirmation. |
| Needs confirmation | 0 of the 12 planted items | The wider close review contains additional non-test items; see the office for their current evidence state. |
False positives in this run: none recorded. The scorecard records the 12 planted items; it does not represent a statistical claim about every client’s books.
The same planted-error test runs on your books before anything goes live.