Ledger Summit
Controlled test method

What “12 of 12” means.

Harborview is a fictional consulting company. We planted 12 known finance issues across its connected sandbox sources, ran the office once, and scored whether it found the issue, matched the relevant amount and showed evidence.

Inspect the live office

Test inputs and scoring

Inputs

QuickBooks Online sandbox, Gmail, Google Drive contracts and documents, and Microsoft Teams. The company is fictional; connected source reads are live in the controlled sandbox.

Score

For each planted issue: found, amount matches where applicable, and source evidence shown. This is not a claim of universal production accuracy.

Result

12 of 12 planted issues found in one seven-minute pass. Eight were proven from available evidence; four were likely and explicitly required confirmation.

The 12 planted issues

Links open the relevant office area. The bank-change record is available as a visitor deep link; the other test issues are summarized in the close and numbers panels.

Proven

Duplicate Nexus vendor payment — $14,820

Two payments for the same May invoice. See in the office →

Likely

Premium Support above contract — $7,500

Six months of unordered support charges. See in the office →

Proven

Revenue before acceptance — $60,000

Meridian milestone recorded before documented acceptance. See in the office →

Likely

Unbilled price increase — $2,700

Sunrise renewal pricing not reflected in invoices. See in the office →

Likely

Capital purchase expensed — $28,600

Laptop refresh requires capitalization-policy confirmation. See in the office →

Likely

Insurance prepaid — $6,000 effect

Annual premium was recorded entirely in January. See in the office →

Proven

Bank-reconciliation break — $9,315

Keystone receipt and bank fee missing from the books. See in the office →

Proven

Loan principal as interest — $68,363

Loan balance and interest expense were misstated. See in the office →

Proven

Vendor-bank-change fraud attempt — $0

Look-alike email with hidden instructions. Open the evidence →

What the office escalated instead of guessing

Evidence stateCount in the 12-item testMeaning
Proven8Ledger, bank, email or other available source directly supported the finding.
Likely4The pattern was material, but a contract or policy detail needed named-person confirmation.
Needs confirmation0 of the 12 planted itemsThe wider close review contains additional non-test items; see the office for their current evidence state.

False positives in this run: none recorded. The scorecard records the 12 planted items; it does not represent a statistical claim about every client’s books.

The same planted-error test runs on your books before anything goes live.

See the close →   Full findings report (external) →